Whew, getting back on track! I've been reading, but updating. Whoops.
I recently read The Thinking Woman's Guide to a Better Birth by Henci Goer. This book seems to be very well-regarded, and for good reason. Goer does a great job of laying out the findings of a whole lot of research in a way that's easily readable and accessible to someone without a medical background.
She does have a strong bias towards natural birth, as she explains in the introduction. I appreciate that she acknowledges her biases and she is honest about them with the reader. This sometimes translates into a bit of bias that is a bit... not anti-OB, I don't want to say, and not quite hostile, but certainly suspicious.
However, this book is really well-researched, and written very clearly. I think that people who come into reading this, feeling pretty down with medicalized hospital birth but curious about the other side, can overlook the occasional anti-OB comment and appreciate the really solid research in this book. There's a ton of tremendously useful and educational stats in here.
I had a few little quibbles with the book. There were a few little inconsistencies - saying in one chapter that EFM is basically pointless, because it increases interventions without improving outcomes, but then saying in the VBAC chapter that EFM was recommended, without elaborating more on why that should be. I also disliked the style of citing sources. The main body of the text contains explanations for laypeople without citations. Then, there is an appendix at the end of the book for each chapter that summarizes the literature sources, so that you can link a specific assertion with its source. For me, as a scientist, it bothered me to not to be able to link a statement with a citation! But, maybe it is more comfortable for the general reader to read chapters uncluttered by citations and journal article titles, so maybe that is a strength of the book.
One interesting new medical thing I learned from this book - okay, two: (1) Women are given a big bolus of IV fluid, on the order of at least a liter (4 cups), when they get an epidural or before a C-section. This is to raise blood pressure, to counteract the blood pressure-lowering effect of an epidural. (2) That's a ton of water all at once, and it may be (at least partially) responsible for the problem of increased fluid in the lungs and respiratory issues in C-section babies.
Another post coming up soon on some more specific thoughts!
P.S. Can anyone tell me how to pronounce "Henci Goer"? I have no clue and it really bothers me. Hensy? Henchi? 'Ensy? Gore? Go-er?
Below are links to medical articles on how mother's thoughts affect her blood hormones and these hormones enter her child's body via the blood (to a fetus) or milk (to a infant ) and these lustful hormones bind to the child's receptors as if the child had thought the lustful thoughts and how these first impressions on the childs mind and brain PERMANENTLY undermine his/her moral character and mental abilities .
ReplyDeletehttp://milkgenomics.org/article/hormones-in-mothers-milk-influence-babys-behavior/
So I think the person who posted the discussion was just wanting to spread awareness among health professionals and councilors about this so that the councillors could WARN mothers to leave reading this type of literature for the 2-3 year period between conception and weaning if they want children who wont be distracted in school by sexual impulses and thus who will score higher and be happier .
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ajp.20806
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eb14/279cc0e78d0f327e847391631daf6863c423.pdf